| Sand CastingAdvantagesDisadvantages Recommended ApplicationLeast Expensive in small quantities (less than 100) Ferrous and non – ferrous metals may be cast Possible to cast very large parts. • Least expensive toolingDimensional accuracy inferior to other processes, requires larger tolerances Castings usually exceed calculated weight Surface finish of ferrous castings usually exceeds 125 RMSUse when strength/weight ratio permits Tolerances, surface finish and low machining cost does not warrant a more expensive processPermanent and Semi-permanent Mold CastingLess expensive than Investment or Die Castings Dimensional Tolerances closer than Sand Castings Castings are dense and pressure tightOnly non-ferrous metals may be cast by this process Less competitive with Sand Cast process when three or more sand cores are required Higher tooling cost than Sand CastUse when process recommended for parts subjected to hydrostatic pressure Ideal for parts having low profile, no cores and quantities in excess of 300Plaster CastSmooth “As Cast” finish (25 RMS) Closer dimensional tolerance than Sand Cast • Intricate shapes and fine details including thinner “As Cast” walls are possible • Large parts cost less to cast than by Investment processMore costly than Sand or Permanent Mold-Casting Limited number of sources Requires minimum of 1 deg. draftUse when parts require smooth “As Cast” surface finish and closer tolerances than possible with Sand or Permanent Mold ProcessesInvestment CastClose dimensional tolerance Complex shape, fine detail, intricate core sections and thin walls are possible Ferrous and non-ferrous metals may be cast As-Cast” finish (64 – 125 RMS)Costs are higher than Sand, Permanent Mold or Plaster process CastingsUse when Complexity precludes use of Sand or Permanent Mold Castings The process cost is justified through savings in machining or brazing Weight savings justifies increased costDie CastingGood dimensional tolerances are possible Excellent part-part dimensional consistency Parts require a minimal post machiningEconomical only in very large quantities due to high tool cost Not recommended for hydrostatic pressure applications For Castings where penetrant (die) or radiographic inspection are not required. Difficult to guarantee minimum mechanical propertiesUse when quantity of parts justifies the high tooling cost Parts are not structural and are subjected to hydrostatic pressure |
